Career
Menu

Embracing Disruption

ChatGPT: a disruptive force for investors

ChatGPT and generative are set to impact many industries. Read what investors need to know.

Key takeaways
  • ChatGPT and generative AI set to impact many industries.
  • Healthcare and education all likely to be strongly affected.
  • Hardware and semiconductor industries to be at the forefront of delivering the benefits of generative AI.
  • Ethical and legal issue will be raised as generative AI impacts not just business, but fields such as art and academia.

The recent release of the artificial intelligence chatbot ChatGPT has generated a great deal of coverage. Indeed, this is a story that has very much gone beyond the specialist media and entered the public consciousness. This broad coverage and continued interest have been driven by the application’s ability to produce incredibly human like text, with one commentor labeling it “the best artificial intelligence chatbot ever released to the general public”1 , and others hailing its success as a watershed moment in terms of artificial intelligence entering the mainstream.2

Unsurprisingly, the possible implications – including potential risks and downsides – of this new technology have received a broad treatment from commentators, with a range of articles discussing potential ramifications for areas as varied as geopolitics,3 cybercrime,4 customer experience.5 So given the impact of this technology will likely be broad, reaching into areas of human activity and business way beyond what might traditionally be considered “tech”, it will also have implications for investors active in a broad range of sectors.

In order to take a closer look at which industries are likely to be most disrupted by this technology – and thus examine the potential implications for investors – we decide to go straight to the horse’s mouth: we asked ChatGPT to write five bullet points on “industries that will be revolutionized by ChatGPT and why”. Below, we address the platform’s answers and consider the implications for investors in these sectors. 

  • Customer Service: ChatGPT can automate and streamline customer service operations by providing instant and accurate responses to inquiries, reducing wait times and improving customer satisfaction.
  • Healthcare: ChatGPT can assist medical professionals in diagnosing and treating patients, providing access to vast amounts of medical information and helping to improve patient outcomes.
  • Education: ChatGPT can revolutionize the way students learn by providing personalized and interactive educational experiences, allowing for more efficient and effective learning.
  • Finance: ChatGPT can enhance financial decisionmaking by providing real-time market analysis and investment recommendations, helping to improve investment outcomes.
  • Retail: ChatGPT can transform the retail industry by providing customers with personalized shopping experiences, allowing for more efficient product recommendations and increasing customer satisfaction.

The five industries chosen by ChatGPT reflect areas where generative AI is already making an impression, or at least where there is a strong promise of the technology’s future disruptive impact. In terms of retail and customer service, the particular USP of ChatGPT and similar applications – the ability to interact and maintain conversation in a humanlike manner – is already delivering more immersive experiences for consumers.

Healthcare and education are two areas where the disruptive impact of generative AI may be strongly felt in the coming years, yet both offer their unique challenges. AI and machine learning have found a growing use in medicine and healthcare for several decades, but the scope of what is now becoming possible will represent a sea change for a range of practices, from drug design and diagnostics through to the management of patient records and e-consultations. However, with healthcare being one of the most highly regulated industries in the world, we are likely to see a cautious approach in some areas. Education will face a similar set of challenges. While perhaps not as highly regulated in the same was as healthcare, it remains a sector with a very high level of state involvement – indeed, in many cases, the state remains the main, or even sole, provider of educational services. Alongside the degree of the state involvement in these sectors, there will also be social and governance issues to navigate in sectors where AI begins to encroach onto tasks previously undertaken by humans, many of whom may be highly skilled and specialized.

One further area where we already seeing an impact – and that ChatGPT omitted to mention – is the automation of certain specialized reporting and other activities. For instance, a “Magic Circle” legal firm recently announced that it would be deploying a generative AI tool to assist lawyers in the drafting of certain documents.6 As these tools become more developed, this is certainly an area where their use is likely to quickly grow.

Considering the broader effects

The one sector ChatGPT seems to have forgotten about, however, is the one that enables it and its generative AI comrades to perform the feats of quasi-creative writing that amaze us humans: hardware. The leaps and bounds by which machine learning, artificial intelligence, and their latest incarnation, generative AI, have grown in recent years would have been unthinkable without the advances seen in semiconductors and other hardware. In particular, specialized semiconductors and computer chip systems, originally developed for the specific demands of graphic processing, have been essential in powering the processing of the vast data necessary to train AIs such as ChatGPT. It is no wonder, then, that semiconductors are at the forefront of the trade tensions that have emerged between the US and China. Indeed, a further dimension to this competition has been added by the recent announcement from a large Chinese corporate regarding the release of its own generative AI chatbot. We believe the geopolitical implications of competing systems originating from different countries is something that will be keenly observed as it plays out over the coming years.

Another area worth considering is the ethical impact of tools such as ChatGPT. Of course, many new and disruptive technologies come with risks which pose ethical dilemmas, and these issues may be particularly pronounced in the case of generative AI. For instance, the recent prevalence of “deepfakes” potentially brings the problem of fake news to a new and more concerning level. Indeed, computer generated texts, images and videos will lead us to swiftly reassess the standards by which we judge information to be truthful or otherwise. In practical terms, fields such as art and academia will need to develop ways of living with these new tools, and the law will need to deal with copyright ambiguities surrounding the ownership of content generated by AI. These questions have recently been brought sharply into focus by the move from Italy’s Data Protection Watchdog to order ChatGPT’s owners to cease processing Italian users’ data, effectively banning the app in the country.7 Furthermore, we are already seeing controversies over the use of the tool at schools and universities around the world. 

The view for investors 

ChatGPT’s response to our query, and the implications discussed above, demonstrate that the disruptive potential of generative AI is huge – indeed, just how disruptive it is likely to be is something that may still be underappreciated by many commentators and market participants. However, it is also clear that its impact will be uneven and individual sectors and industries will face their own issues and move at different paces – not least the hardware sector that underpins all developments of machine learning and AI.

One thing that many sectors have in common is that firms will be subject to Digital Darwinism where there will be clear winners and losers. Those that adapt quickly and leverage the tipping point we’re now reaching in terms of the accessibility of disruptive new technologies stand to be big winners, while other may be left behind. For equity investors, what this means is an approach to stock picking that recognizes the nuances both between and within sectors, and the uneven impact that the rapid development and deployment of generative AI will have.

 

1 https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/05/technology/chatgpt-ai-twitter.html
2 https://www.theverge.com/2022/12/8/23499728/ai-capability-accessibility-chatgpt-stable-diffusion-commercialization
3 https://ecfr.eu/article/insights-from-an-ai-author-the-geopolitical-consequences-of-chatgpt
4 https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2023/02/24/the-implications-of-chatgpt-on-cybercrime
5 https://venturebeat.com/ai/chatgpt-and-its-implications-for-customer-experience
6 https://www.ft.com/content/1e34f334-4e73-4677-9713-99f85eed7ba0
7 https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-65139406

  • Disclaimer
    Information herein is based on sources we believe to be accurate and reliable as at the date it was made. We reserve the right to revise any information herein at any time without notice. No offer or solicitation to buy or sell securities and no investment advice or recommendation is made herein. In making investment decisions, investors should not rely solely on this material but should seek independent professional advice. However, if you choose not to seek professional advice, you should consider the suitability of the product for yourself. Investment involves risks including the possible loss of principal amount invested and risks associated with investment in emerging and less developed markets. Past performance of the fund manager(s), or any prediction, projection or forecast, is not indicative of future performance. This material has not been reviewed by any regulatory authorities. Issuer: Hong Kong – Allianz Global Investors Asia Pacific Ltd. 2951104

Recent insights

US elections monitor: policy impact

Navigating Rates

US elections monitor: policy impact

All eyes will be on the US elections in November – but the implications for markets could be quite different depending on who wins.

Discover more

by Greg Meier | 21/10/2024

Embracing Disruption

Investing in China’s State Owned Enterprises: A Deep Dive

For many years, investing in China’s State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) has typically been viewed by international investors as, at best, a low-quality proxy for China’s economic growth. They have been synonymous with low profitability, questionable governance, and poor shareholder returns.

Discover more

by Tessa Wong | 18/10/2024

Navigating Rates

CIO roundtable: what can investors learn from a super-election year?

Going into the year, 2024 was always set to be an intense election period, with polls in more than 60 countries. It turned out to be even more action-packed than anticipated, with snap elections in France and Japan giving investors even more to focus on, in addition to the US election. What are the implications of one of the busiest years in election history? We asked our global CIOs how investors could position themselves in a shifting political terrain.

Discover more
by Gregor Hirt , Virginie Maisonneuve , Michael Krautzberger , Eric Stein | 14/10/2024

Allianz Global Investors

You are leaving this website and being re-directed to the below website. This does not imply any approval or endorsement of the information by Allianz Global Investors Asia Pacific Limited contained in the redirected website nor does Allianz Global Investors Asia Pacific Limited accept any responsibility or liability in connection with this hyperlink and the information contained herein. Please keep in mind that the redirected website may contain funds and strategies not authorized for offering to the public in your jurisdiction. Besides, please also take note on the redirected website’s terms and conditions, privacy and security policies, or other legal information. By clicking “Continue”, you confirm you acknowledge the details mentioned above and would like to continue accessing the redirected website. Please click “Stay here” if you have any concerns.

Welcome to Allianz Global Investors

Select your language
  • 中文(繁體)
  • English
Select your role
  • Individual Investor
  • Intermediaries
  • Other Investors
  • Pension Investors

  • Allianz Global Investors Fund (“AGIF”)

    • Allianz Global Investors Fund (“AGIF”) as an umbrella fund under the UCITS regulations has within it different sub-funds investing in fixed income securities, equities, and derivative instruments, each with a different investment objective and/or risk profile.

    • All sub-funds (“Sub-Funds”) may invest in financial derivative instruments (“FDI”) which may expose to higher leverage, counterparty, liquidity, valuation, volatility, market and over the counter transaction risks. A Sub-Fund’s net derivative exposure may be up to 50% of its NAV. 

    • Some Sub-Funds as part of their investments may invest in any one or a combination of the instruments such as fixed income securities, emerging market securities, and/or mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities, property-backed securities (especially REITs) and/or structured products and/or FDI, exposing to various potential risks (including leverage, counterparty, liquidity, valuation, volatility, market, fluctuations in the value of and the rental income received in respect of the underlying property, and over the counter transaction risks). 

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest in single countries or industry sectors (in particular small/mid cap companies) which may reduce risk diversification. Some Sub-Funds are exposed to significant risks which include investment/general market, country and region, emerging market (such as Mainland China), creditworthiness/credit rating/downgrading, default, asset allocation, interest rate, volatility and liquidity, counterparty, sovereign debt, valuation, credit rating agency, company-specific, currency  (in particular RMB), RMB debt securities and Mainland China tax risks. 

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest in convertible bonds, high-yield, non-investment grade investments and unrated securities that may subject to higher risks (include volatility, loss of principal and interest, creditworthiness and downgrading, default, interest rate, general market and liquidity risks) and therefore may adversely impact the net asset value of the Sub-Funds. Convertibles will be exposed prepayment risk, equity movement and greater volatility than straight bond investments.

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest a significant portion of the assets in interest-bearing securities issued or guaranteed by a non-investment grade sovereign issuer (e.g. Philippines) and is subject to higher risks of liquidity, credit, concentration and default of the sovereign issuer as well as greater volatility and higher risk profile that may result in significant losses to the investors. 

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest in European countries. The economic and financial difficulties in Europe may get worse and adversely affect the Sub-Funds (such as increased volatility, liquidity and currency risks associated with investments in Europe).

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest in the China A-Shares market, China B-Shares market and/or debt securities directly  via the Stock Connect or the China Interbank Bond Market or Bond Connect and or other foreign access regimes and/or other permitted means and/or indirectly through all eligible instruments the qualified foreign institutional investor program regime and thus is subject to the associated risks (including quota limitations, change in rule and regulations, repatriation of the Fund’s monies, trade restrictions, clearing and settlement, China market volatility and uncertainty, China market volatility and uncertainty, potential clearing and/or settlement difficulties and, change in economic, social and political policy in the PRC and taxation Mainland China tax risks).  Investing in RMB share classes is also exposed to RMB currency risks and adverse impact on the share classes due to currency depreciation.

    • Some Sub-Funds may adopt the following strategies, Sustainable and Responsible Investment Strategy, SDG-Aligned Strategy, Sustainability Key Performance Indicator Strategy (Relative), Green Bond Strategy, Multi Asset Sustainable Strategy, Sustainability Key Performance Indicator Strategy (Absolute Threshold), Environment, Social and Governance (“ESG”) Score Strategy, and Sustainability Key Performance Indicator Strategy (Absolute). The Sub-Funds may be exposed to sustainable investment risks relating to the strategies (such as foregoing opportunities to buy certain securities when it might otherwise be advantageous to do so, selling securities when it might be disadvantageous to do so, and/or relying on information and data from third party ESG research data providers and internal analyses which may be subjective, incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable and/or reducing risk diversifications compared to broadly based funds) which may result in the Sub-Fund being more volatile and have adverse impact on the performance of the Sub-Fund and consequently adversely affect an investor’s investment in the Sub-Fund. Also, some Sub-Funds may be particularly focusing on the GHG efficiency of the investee companies rather than their financial performance which may have an adverse impact on the Fund’s performance.

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest in share class with fixed distribution percentage (Class AMf). Investors should note that fixed distribution percentage is not guaranteed. The share class is not an alternative to fixed interest paying investment. The percentage of distributions paid by these share classes is unrelated to expected or past income or returns of these share classes or the Sub-Funds. Distribution will continue even the Sub-Fund has negative returns and may adversely impact the net asset value of the Sub-Fund.  Positive distribution yield does not imply positive return.

    • Investment involves risks that could result in loss of part or entire amount of investors’ investment.

    • In making investment decisions, investors should not rely solely on this [website/material].

    Note: Dividend payments may, at the sole discretion of the Investment Manager, be made out of the Sub-Fund’s capital or effectively out of the Sub-Fund’s capital which represents a return or withdrawal of part of the amount investors originally invested and/or capital gains attributable to the original investment. This may result in an immediate decrease in the NAV per share and the capital of the Sub-Fund available for investment in the future and capital growth may be reduced, in particular for hedged share classes for which the distribution amount and NAV of any hedged share classes (HSC) may be adversely affected by differences in the interests rates of the reference currency of the HSC and the base currency of the respective Sub-Fund. Dividend payments are applicable for Class A/AM/AMg/AMi/AMgi/AQ Dis (Annually/Monthly/Quarterly distribution) and for reference only but not guaranteed.  Positive distribution yield does not imply positive return. For details, please refer to the Sub-Fund’s distribution policy disclosed in the offering documents.


    Allianz Global Investors Asia Fund

    • Allianz Global Investors Asia Fund (the “Trust”) is an umbrella unit trust constituted under the laws of Hong Kong pursuant to the Trust Deed. Allianz Thematic Income and Allianz Selection Income and Growth and Allianz Yield Plus Fund are the sub-funds of the Trust (each a “Sub-Fund”) investing in fixed income securities, equities and derivative instrument, each with a different investment objective and/or risk profile.

    • Some Sub-Funds are exposed to significant risks which include investment/general market, company-specific, emerging market, creditworthiness/credit rating/downgrading, default, volatility and liquidity, valuation, sovereign debt, thematic concentration, thematic-based investment strategy, counterparty, interest rate changes, country and region, asset allocation risks and currency (such as exchange controls, in particular RMB), and the adverse impact on RMB share classes due to currency depreciation.  

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest in other underlying collective schemes and exchange traded funds. Investing in exchange traded funds may expose to additional risks such as passive investment, tracking error, underlying index, trading and termination. While investing in other underlying collective schemes (“CIS”) may subject to the risks associated to such CIS. 

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest in high-yield (non-investment grade and unrated) investments and/or convertible bonds which may subject to higher risks, such as volatility, creditworthiness, default, interest rate changes, general market and liquidity risks and therefore may  adversely impact the net asset value of the Fund. Convertibles may also expose to risks such as prepayment, equity movement, and greater volatility than straight bond investments.

    • All Sub-Funds may invest in financial derivative instruments (“FDI”) which may expose to higher leverage, counterparty, liquidity, valuation, volatility, market and over the counter transaction risks.  The use of derivatives may result in losses to the Sub-Funds which are greater than the amount originally invested. A Sub-Fund’s net derivative exposure may be up to 50% of its NAV.

    • These investments may involve risks that could result in loss of part or entire amount of investors’ investment.

    • In making investment decisions, investors should not rely solely on this website.

    Note: Dividend payments may, at the sole discretion of the Investment Manager, be made out of the Sub-Fund’s income and/or capital which in the latter case represents a return or withdrawal of part of the amount investors originally invested and/or capital gains attributable to the original investment. This may result in an immediate decrease in the NAV per distribution unit and the capital of the Sub-Fund available for investment in the future and capital growth may be reduced, in particular for hedged share classes for which the distribution amount and NAV of any hedged share classes (HSC) may be adversely affected by differences in the interests rates of the reference currency of the HSC and the base currency of the Sub-Fund. Dividend payments are applicable for Class A/AM/AMg/AMi/AMgi Dis (Annually/Monthly distribution) and for reference only but not guaranteed.  Positive distribution yield does not imply positive return. For details, please refer to the Sub-Fund’s distribution policy disclosed in the offering documents.

     

Please indicate you have read and understood the Important Notice.