For a way out of the coronavirus crisis, put a price on carbon

20/08/2020
For a way out of the coronavirus crisis, put a price on carbon

Summary

The coronavirus crisis gives policymakers a unique chance to reprioritise their economies, focusing on areas that didn’t get enough attention when economic momentum was strong. Climate change is a good example, and there are compelling reasons to begin implementing an EU-wide carbon-pricing system now.


Key takeaways

  • The coronavirus crisis has changed people’s habits, perhaps permanently, and demonstrated what a less energy-intensive world would look like
  • The EU can use this crisis to recalibrate its economy and catalyse economic growth in an environmentally responsible way
  • Policymakers should be open to bold innovations that get people back to work – including implementing a new carbon pricing system, which has been made more viable by the steep drop in energy prices
  • In Europe, the revenue from a carbon pricing system could be distributed in two ways to make up for slowing economic activity: in equal per-capita payments to all EU residents, and as investments in energy technology to support the transition to carbon-neutral sources

As the number of covid-19 cases plateaus and the magnitude of the medical challenge becomes easier to estimate, policymakers and economists are looking to stabilise and re-ignite stalling economies. It has become clear that the economic hangover from the pandemic may indeed be longer lived than the disease itself. Consider all the ways the lockdown has changed people’s habits as they found an alternative way of living.

For example, business travel is likely to be significantly reduced, and companies and employees could recalibrate the amount of time spent in the office versus time spent at home. This could affect all the business sectors supporting travel and commuting, as well as the balance between commercial and residential real estate. This pandemic has also further accelerated the adoption of online shopping and entertainment over their non-virtual alternatives, which will be a challenge for retail and physical entertainment. People have even discovered how to live without professional sporting events, which could change their relationship to their favourite teams in the future.

In any case, there will be industries that are existentially challenged by the crisis – and the resulting behavioural changes – and there will be industries that benefit. Beyond that, policymakers have a unique chance to change the priorities of economies coming out of the crisis to focus on areas that they wanted to devote more attention to, but did not because of strong economic momentum.

The coronavirus crisis has implications for climate change

In Europe (and potentially in other regions), climate change and the associated energy transition got a lot of media and political attention in 2019. Yet tangible, clear changes that might lead to a carbon-neutral world by 2050 were still a bit hard to discern. The advent of the coronavirus crisis has dramatically shown how a less energy-intensive world could look, and it could also make European countries more open to bold innovations that could help get people back to work.

One such move could be a pan-European carbon-pricing system, which has been made more viable by the steep drop in energy prices – particularly oil. Low prices present a unique opportunity to implement such a system without significant initial marginal costs to industry compared with the pre-coronavirus period. We believe there are intelligent solutions to be found that maintain the European Union’s global competitiveness through border-adjustment pricing and trade regulations.

Moreover, if this carbon price were implemented at the EU level, it would provide significant funds for a common European budget. I like the idea from Robert Litterman of Climate Central to use the proceeds to fund a “poll credit” in the form of a per-capita distribution to all EU residents. Perhaps a smaller share of the revenue could also be used to support additional energy-transition investments. Using the proceeds in this way could help make up for otherwise slowing economic activity.

A carbon-price system could be good for the EU

Ideally, a carbon-price system would apply globally, but since any global approach is unrealistic for the time being, starting inside the EU would be a good first step. Using a common carbon price for a common good would give European countries a good reason for doing something on an EU-wide basis. Since the negative externalities of global warming are suffered by all – not just by carbon-producing countries – a pan-European carbon price with associated pan-European distribution of revenue would be appropriate. Under such a system, the biggest polluters would contribute more, and everyone would benefit equally from the funds as compensation for widespread environmental deterioration. Fiscal transfers for general government expenditures are difficult to agree on, but it’s more politically palatable to implement a levy on the use of a common good (global carbon capacity) and then redistribute it to all.

A carbon-pricing system could help the energy transition - and individual citizens

Just to put some rough numbers around the proposal, the 27 countries of the EU have a combined population of about 445 million people. According to Eurostat, the CO2 consumption of the EU-27 is close to 4 billion tonnes per year – roughly 9 tonnes per capita. With a CO2 price of EUR 100 per tonne (which works out to about EUR 45 per barrel of oil), the carbon-pricing system would provide the EU with revenues of about EUR 400 billion.

If EUR 90 billion of this was spent on the energy transition and the rest was distributed to EU residents on a per capita basis, each EU resident (including children and retirees) could expect about EUR 700 per year in direct EU subsidies. This would have several positive effects – including creating a tangible benefit of EU membership, and providing massive direct stimulus when the economy is struggling.

With the oil price now under EUR 30 per barrel, the extra EUR 45 per barrel carbon price would leave us at about EUR 75 per barrel. This is within the price range that industry has been accustomed to in recent years, so it wouldn’t really be a specific brake on economic activity. Furthermore, the EUR 90 billion investment in energy transition and infrastructure would go a long way toward meeting the EU’s investment goals. In addition, if everyone in the EU started getting a direct cheque from the European Commission for EUR 700 per year, the overall popularity of the EU would improve.

The EUR 90 billion should be invested in energy technology to support the transition to carbon-neutral sources. Here the EU can subsidise investments in smart home technologies, smart grids, better transmission infrastructure, carbon-capture systems and battery/storage technologies. As the coronavirus has re-emphasised the need to look after our living environment, the need to limit climate change is more compelling than ever. The EU has a chance to become the world leader in driving the changes necessary to limit greenhouse gases. Restarting economies will be an important objective for policymakers in the second half of 2020. This is an ideal opportunity for them to use their enormous policy levers to direct economic activity in a way that both improves the world and allows for new growth vectors that put the EU ahead of the curve, not behind it.

A carbon price could help the EU innovate and grow in a sustainable way

To ensure that there would be no CO2 leakage into the EU through imports, the EU would also need to implement a CO2 border-adjustment charge for the CO2 produced in the manufacturing of goods in their home countries. Similarly, exported goods would get a CO2 credit when exported outside the EU to ensure that they remain cost competitive outside the union. This would encourage energy efficiency not only at home, but also with trading partners, as imports with high carbon footprints would have difficulty competing with products made in a more benign way. Eventually it would also provide a blueprint for other economies that would like to focus on environmental responsibility and create a standard for how to approach global warming. The EU should see the current crisis as an opportunity to recalibrate its economy and industrial policy to become a global innovator and rediscover how to catalyse economic growth in an environmentally responsible way.

 

> download

 

A shared vision is vital for a sustainable recovery

02/09/2020
A shared vision is vital for a sustainable recovery

Summary

The human and economic costs of the Covid-19 pandemic have refocused minds on the challenges facing societies globally. Solutions will likely involve multiple stakeholders and investors, and blended finance could be critical in unlocking shared value.

Key takeaways

  • The Covid-19 pandemic has inspired market participants to think even more creatively about how to achieve meaningful real-life change through finance
  • Investors recognise that generating financial alpha is possible while meeting societal targets, and post-crisis we expect greater emphasis on the social element of environmental, social and governance (ESG) investing
  • Blended finance, where development capital spurs private sector investment, allows investors to invest towards a societal objective within their risk appetite
  • We believe active managers will play a vital role in structuring deals to maximise the impact of every dollar invested – from a financial and societal perspective

Allianz Global Investors

You are leaving this website and being re-directed to the below website. This does not imply any approval or endorsement of the information by Allianz Global Investors Asia Pacific Limited contained in the redirected website nor does Allianz Global Investors Asia Pacific Limited accept any responsibility or liability in connection with this hyperlink and the information contained herein. Please keep in mind that the redirected website may contain funds and strategies not authorized for offering to the public in your jurisdiction. Besides, please also take note on the redirected website’s terms and conditions, privacy and security policies, or other legal information. By clicking “Continue”, you confirm you acknowledge the details mentioned above and would like to continue accessing the redirected website. Please click “Stay here” if you have any concerns.

Welcome to Allianz Global Investors

Select your language
  • 中文(繁體)
  • English
Select your role
  • Individual Investor
  • Intermediaries
  • Other Investors
  • Pension Investors
  • Allianz Global Investors Fund (“AGIF”)

    • Allianz Global Investors Fund (“AGIF”) as an umbrella fund under the UCITS regulations has within it different sub-funds investing in fixed income securities, equities, and derivative instruments, each with a different investment objective and/or risk profile.

    • All sub-funds (“Sub-Funds”) may invest in financial derivative instruments (“FDI”) which may expose to higher leverage, counterparty, liquidity, valuation, volatility, market and over the counter transaction risks. A Sub-Fund’s net derivative exposure may be up to 50% of its NAV. 

    • Some Sub-Funds as part of their investments may invest in any one or a combination of the instruments such as fixed income securities, emerging market securities, and/or mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities, property-backed securities (especially REITs) and/or structured products and/or FDI, exposing to various potential risks (including leverage, counterparty, liquidity, valuation, volatility, market, fluctuations in the value of and the rental income received in respect of the underlying property, and over the counter transaction risks). 

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest in single countries or industry sectors (in particular small/mid cap companies) which may reduce risk diversification. Some Sub-Funds are exposed to significant risks which include investment/general market, country and region, emerging market (such as Mainland China), creditworthiness/credit rating/downgrading, default, asset allocation, interest rate, volatility and liquidity, counterparty, sovereign debt, valuation, credit rating agency, company-specific, currency  (in particular RMB), RMB debt securities and Mainland China tax risks. 

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest in convertible bonds, high-yield, non-investment grade investments and unrated securities that may subject to higher risks (include volatility, loss of principal and interest, creditworthiness and downgrading, default, interest rate, general market and liquidity risks) and therefore may adversely impact the net asset value of the Sub-Funds. Convertibles will be exposed prepayment risk, equity movement and greater volatility than straight bond investments.

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest a significant portion of the assets in interest-bearing securities issued or guaranteed by a non-investment grade sovereign issuer (e.g. Philippines) and is subject to higher risks of liquidity, credit, concentration and default of the sovereign issuer as well as greater volatility and higher risk profile that may result in significant losses to the investors. 

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest in European countries. The economic and financial difficulties in Europe may get worse and adversely affect the Sub-Funds (such as increased volatility, liquidity and currency risks associated with investments in Europe).

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest in the China A-Shares market, China B-Shares market and/or debt securities directly  via the Stock Connect or the China Interbank Bond Market or Bond Connect and or other foreign access regimes and/or other permitted means and/or indirectly through all eligible instruments the qualified foreign institutional investor program regime and thus is subject to the associated risks (including quota limitations, change in rule and regulations, repatriation of the Fund’s monies, trade restrictions, clearing and settlement, China market volatility and uncertainty, China market volatility and uncertainty, potential clearing and/or settlement difficulties and, change in economic, social and political policy in the PRC and taxation Mainland China tax risks).  Investing in RMB share classes is also exposed to RMB currency risks and adverse impact on the share classes due to currency depreciation.

    • Some Sub-Funds may adopt the following strategies, Sustainable and Responsible Investment Strategy, SDG-Aligned Strategy, Sustainability Key Performance Indicator Strategy (Relative), Green Bond Strategy, Multi Asset Sustainable Strategy, Sustainability Key Performance Indicator Strategy (Absolute Threshold), Environment, Social and Governance (“ESG”) Score Strategy, and Sustainability Key Performance Indicator Strategy (Absolute). The Sub-Funds may be exposed to sustainable investment risks relating to the strategies (such as foregoing opportunities to buy certain securities when it might otherwise be advantageous to do so, selling securities when it might be disadvantageous to do so, and/or relying on information and data from third party ESG research data providers and internal analyses which may be subjective, incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable and/or reducing risk diversifications compared to broadly based funds) which may result in the Sub-Fund being more volatile and have adverse impact on the performance of the Sub-Fund and consequently adversely affect an investor’s investment in the Sub-Fund. Also, some Sub-Funds may be particularly focusing on the GHG efficiency of the investee companies rather than their financial performance which may have an adverse impact on the Fund’s performance.

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest in share class with fixed distribution percentage (Class AMf). Investors should note that fixed distribution percentage is not guaranteed. The share class is not an alternative to fixed interest paying investment. The percentage of distributions paid by these share classes is unrelated to expected or past income or returns of these share classes or the Sub-Funds. Distribution will continue even the Sub-Fund has negative returns and may adversely impact the net asset value of the Sub-Fund.  Positive distribution yield does not imply positive return.

    • Investment involves risks that could result in loss of part or entire amount of investors’ investment.

    • In making investment decisions, investors should not rely solely on this [website/material].

    Note: Dividend payments may, at the sole discretion of the Investment Manager, be made out of the Sub-Fund’s capital or effectively out of the Sub-Fund’s capital which represents a return or withdrawal of part of the amount investors originally invested and/or capital gains attributable to the original investment. This may result in an immediate decrease in the NAV per share and the capital of the Sub-Fund available for investment in the future and capital growth may be reduced, in particular for hedged share classes for which the distribution amount and NAV of any hedged share classes (HSC) may be adversely affected by differences in the interests rates of the reference currency of the HSC and the base currency of the respective Sub-Fund. Dividend payments are applicable for Class A/AM/AMg/AMi/AMgi/AQ Dis (Annually/Monthly/Quarterly distribution) and for reference only but not guaranteed.  Positive distribution yield does not imply positive return. For details, please refer to the Sub-Fund’s distribution policy disclosed in the offering documents.


    Allianz Global Investors Asia Fund

    • Allianz Global Investors Asia Fund (the “Trust”) is an umbrella unit trust constituted under the laws of Hong Kong pursuant to the Trust Deed. Allianz Thematic Income and Allianz Selection Income and Growth and Allianz Yield Plus Fund are the sub-funds of the Trust (each a “Sub-Fund”) investing in fixed income securities, equities and derivative instrument, each with a different investment objective and/or risk profile.

    • Some Sub-Funds are exposed to significant risks which include investment/general market, company-specific, emerging market, creditworthiness/credit rating/downgrading, default, volatility and liquidity, valuation, sovereign debt, thematic concentration, thematic-based investment strategy, counterparty, interest rate changes, country and region, asset allocation risks and currency (such as exchange controls, in particular RMB), and the adverse impact on RMB share classes due to currency depreciation.  

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest in other underlying collective schemes and exchange traded funds. Investing in exchange traded funds may expose to additional risks such as passive investment, tracking error, underlying index, trading and termination. While investing in other underlying collective schemes (“CIS”) may subject to the risks associated to such CIS. 

    • Some Sub-Funds may invest in high-yield (non-investment grade and unrated) investments and/or convertible bonds which may subject to higher risks, such as volatility, creditworthiness, default, interest rate changes, general market and liquidity risks and therefore may  adversely impact the net asset value of the Fund. Convertibles may also expose to risks such as prepayment, equity movement, and greater volatility than straight bond investments.

    • All Sub-Funds may invest in financial derivative instruments (“FDI”) which may expose to higher leverage, counterparty, liquidity, valuation, volatility, market and over the counter transaction risks.  The use of derivatives may result in losses to the Sub-Funds which are greater than the amount originally invested. A Sub-Fund’s net derivative exposure may be up to 50% of its NAV.

    • These investments may involve risks that could result in loss of part or entire amount of investors’ investment.

    • In making investment decisions, investors should not rely solely on this website.

    Note: Dividend payments may, at the sole discretion of the Investment Manager, be made out of the Sub-Fund’s income and/or capital which in the latter case represents a return or withdrawal of part of the amount investors originally invested and/or capital gains attributable to the original investment. This may result in an immediate decrease in the NAV per distribution unit and the capital of the Sub-Fund available for investment in the future and capital growth may be reduced, in particular for hedged share classes for which the distribution amount and NAV of any hedged share classes (HSC) may be adversely affected by differences in the interests rates of the reference currency of the HSC and the base currency of the Sub-Fund. Dividend payments are applicable for Class A/AM/AMg/AMi/AMgi Dis (Annually/Monthly distribution) and for reference only but not guaranteed.  Positive distribution yield does not imply positive return. For details, please refer to the Sub-Fund’s distribution policy disclosed in the offering documents.

     

Please indicate you have read and understood the Important Notice.